of remote workers had too little information about their organisation.
There is a difference between working individually and working as a team. If my work is solitary - a bus driver for example - then my interaction with my peers, my manager and the environment is different to someone who works in hospitality.
The research suggests that working in hospitality, like a cafe for example, the individual employee is part of a team. The team start shifts together, rely on each other to serve customers etc. When the employee works in a solitary role like a bus driver or train driver this is not the case. They don't rely on others to complete the tasks of the job.
These are workers who don’t need anyone else to do their job. Their work is carried out on their own and they only see people they work with during breaks or at the start/end of their working day.
Working in hospitality is often mixed. The individual might work in a team at times and on their own in others. It means that their interactions with others are a mix of work and social
Working in a team and being reliant on each other to complete a task is very different to other ways of working. A true team brings different skills together to complement each other and overcome a challenge
Understanding the importance of third space is incredibly important once you understand the type of remote workers you have (solitary or team).
When it comes to remote workers, we often look at the spaces they use to convene, and we use that as the place for screens or newsletters. Sociologist Ray Oldenburg coined the term Third Space or Third Place in the early 90s in his book The Great Good Place.
It's a space where people meet to unwind, discuss and talk about things that matter to them. Distinct both from the work environment where communication can be functional and distinct from the domestic space of home.
of remote workers believe that they have all of the information to do their job well
of workers view print magazines as the most interesting channel in terms of non-face-to-face channels,
External sources is one of the main places employees go for news about industry. We are seeing a trend of internal communications teams moving from HR to Corporate Communications function and with the pace of news today, this can only be a good thing.
For organisational news the intranet, the company website and the manager are the core sources – a shift from technology to people starts to emerge.
When we go one layer down into the department or area the main sources are managers, colleagues and team meetings. A sign that for local, department news the face-to-face, conversation approach is better.
Over the years the importance of peer to peer communication has risen due to the increase of internal social networks, employees connected through public social networking sites and the trust in our peers rising.
While all of this remains true, our research tells us that the relevance and trust of the information being shared is incredibly low.
So, while we may want to create networks of champions across an organisation, the trust and belief in that information is lower than other channels like an intranet or a company magazine.
of remote workers view their manager as the most informative and the most accurate channel
2019 research from Gatehouse suggests that this is a mountain we are unable to climb. But it's not something that we should give up on, it takes time and investment in people to do it.
We have already said that we need to equip line managers with the right content, but if they have poor communication skills then even with the right information, it won't have been delivered effectively. The employee won't have what they need to get the job done.